Corona Investigative Committee: Dr David Martin – Exposes Coronavirus Patents Dating Back To 1999 Which Are Claimed To Be Novel! – “… This my friends is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion”

(7/9/21)

Highly recommended must watch viewing!!!

Apparently Pharma company Merc introduced the notion of what they call ‘The New Normal‘, the language that became the branded campaign that was adopted by the  WHO and the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. This was apparently adopted back in 2004!

KEY QUOTE:

Statement made in 2015 by Peter Daszak (head of Eco Health Alliance):

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical counter measures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process”

A few extracts:

“There was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016 the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said the SARS Coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralf Beric, was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation, 73 times!”

“There was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016 the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said the SARS Coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralf Beric, was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation, 73 times!”

“The declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy…not only was this not a novel anything, it’s actually not only not been novel, it’s not been novel for over two decades.”

“In other words we (humans) made SARS and we patented it on April 19th, 2002”

“In 1999 Anthony Fauci funded Research at The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, …. specifically to create, and you cannot help but lement what I’m about to read, because it comes directly from a patent filing from April 19th, 2002 … where the NIAID built an infectious replication defective Coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human Lung Epithelium

… In other words, we made SARS and we patented it on April 19th 2002”

That agent issued as us patent 7279327, that patent clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing…

“… Was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen, and that technology was funded exclusively in the early days as means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.”

“Throughout the fall of 2001, we began monitoring an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through NIH, NIAID…”

“In addition to filing the entire gene sequence on what became SARS coronavirus which is actually a violation of 35 US code section 101, you cannot patent a naturally occurring substance, the 35 US code section 101 violation was patent number 7220852. Now that patent also had a series of derivative patents associated with it, …. “

“… US Patent 776521, these patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus, but also covered the means of detecting it using RT-PCR. Now the reason why that’s a problem is that if you actually both own the patient on the gene itself, and you own the patent on it’s detection…. you have a cunning advantage to being able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself but also it’s detection, meaning you have entire scientific and message control”

“How would one have a patent for a thing that was invented three days earlier?”

“This my friends is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion, this is not a theory, this is evidence. You cannot have information in the future and form a treatment for a thing that does not exist!”

“The paper in which they claim the coronavirus is novel,

“Every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published by the single reference publications, the natural bat coronavirus

“The paper that has been routinely used to identify the novel virus, unfortunately if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find 73 patents issue between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS-COV2”.